Living Intentionally
September 12, 2006
I came across this phrase today– living intentionally– that had never really registered with me in the past (perhaps because I am allergic to self-help books) but is a perfect summation of what all my recent lifestyle changes are about. Talking too much about such changes invokes a kind of superstition… too often the choice seems to be between those who talk about doing and those who actually do… and I prefer the second.
In a long letter I wrote to a friend recently I described my desire to “be present” in my life. That’s my own way of trying to live with more intention. Everything I am working on in my life– lowering stress, exercise, changing eating habits, memorizing poems, writing regularly– is a part of that effort to be more present.
I’m no good at it. Within minutes of reminding myself of these goals I’ll find myself in a trivial argument with someone online or mindlessly surfing when I should be working. The whole contemporary mode of living with all its technological affordances and entertainments seems to be an invitation to dilute my attention, to procrastinate, to avoid the hard questions… until I am hardly even present in my own life. But the only answer is to keep trying. I assume that staying keenly conscious, like meditation, is a skill that becomes stronger with effort and repetition.
Oddly, a lot of being present and living in an intentional manner has to do with letting go. I had a personal example to help me figure this out: I let go of the television quite a while ago and– until recently– that was the best decision I ever made. Now I work on letting go of my materialism, taming my physical appetites, re-engaging with my body as a properly cared for machine necessary for my soul’s survival.
I don’t know what kind of time I have left, but I want to be there for more of it. I want to multi-task less and engage fully more often. Walking around the campus last night as darkness descended I realized that I have to face up to what I will never be… and what I won’t be again. I’ll never again be an emotional 20-year old angry young writer smoking cigarettes outside the student center. I’ll never be the poet under 25 (or 30, or even 35) that I wanted to be.
I have to figure out how to be comfortable in my own skin with what I know and what I love. So I won’t be writing poems re-arranging Lorca or writing through the dialogue of Fassbinder films. I’ll probably never be accepted as part of the circles of hip poets with their button-ups and messenger bags milling around outside rooms in NYC. It’s highly unlikely I’ll be written up in Silliman’s blog as yet another of the bestest avant poets ever.
Instead I’ll toil in my quietude. I’d like to understand some of these other poetries and I’ll keep trying because the honest striving for empathy and understanding of others and their projects is part of being wholly engaged… hopefully I can learn something from them. But I’m OK with my little poems and poets who speak in languages and perform a magic that I can understand. The post-avant crowd are the string-theorists of my world– very much the big thing, clearly important, and vaguely (and sometimes astonishingly) interesting, but mostly incomprehensible and certainly not something I’m likely to find myself doing.
It’s not a zero-sum game. I don’t need to minimize other art to elevate my own. I’ve spent most of my life conceiving of “rightness” as a binary struggle, us and them, dog eat dog. Someone liking a book or poem I did not– or refusing to acknowledge the quality of those I did– was an affront. A friend not taking my advice may as well have been spitting in my face. Reading a blog that praised a poet whose work appeared to me hardly to be poetry at all was a direct attack. Almost all of it’s been a waste of time. There is a time for productive debate in many arenas, but when it comes to art and being an artist, differences are almost always healthy. Why not just let myself love them and the powerful passion that motivates them?
I appreciate that there are beautiful things in the world I can’t find my way into. They are challenges, not insults. When others miss out on the value of something I see I will just count myself lucky. There doesn’t have to be a point to it, there doesn’t have to be a winner. Looking for the first and trying to be the second is just so much wasted time. Time I don’t have.
Tags:
All me-stream all the time.
content rss

September 12th, 2006 at 8:13 pm
“Instead I’ll toil in my quietude. I’d like to understand some of these other poetries and I’ll keep trying because the honest striving for empathy and understanding of others and their projects is part of being wholly engaged… hopefully I can learn something from them.”
– I am also having a hard time understanding much of the “post-avant” poetries being written. But after giving up on a book, I’d find myself reading it again a few days later. If not for meaning then mostly for the music, or perhaps the freshness of treatment. I’ll read Lauterbach, or Silliman and marvel at the beauty of their fragments. But most of the time I don’t understand why a certain set of fragments are put together in a particular poem…. A new method of coherence (incoherence)? Anyway, I too procede with the trust that they are saying something good, but as of the moment, don’t get.
September 14th, 2006 at 6:28 am
I love this post. I’ve been working on this too over the past year. Living with intention is being present to yourself and your world, it’s being engaged, it’s being proactive instead of reactive … most of all, for me, it is a process.
Sounds like you’re on a great path! Thanks for sharing.
October 23rd, 2006 at 4:59 am
Coming across this post has been a gift! I have been working on this business of being engaged in life as fuly as possible for what seems to be most of my life. Have been lucky enough to recognize in others with whom my path has crossed the fact of their living a coherent life, full of personal truth and striving. In fact, I believe that to be a coherent individual means that one has to pick and choose from out of a myriad of distractions available and select the obsession that is the most fruitful for one to practice - for a lifetime. The variety of paths people choose to follow should be seen as rich strings of embroidery in the total fabric of life - all different, all colourful, and all essential.
April 11th, 2007 at 7:51 am
i am a 17 year old poet and, like you, ‘itinerant philosopher.’ I consider myself an Epicurean, and am currently trying to develop a version of Epicureanism that emphasizes the sense of leisure that comes when fully present in the moment, which can be had even while working. I believe that focus on the past and the future, in the main, cause us worry and regret and should be avoided. We should avoid confusion and complexity because uncertainty in the moment generally leads to a certain amount of unhappiness in itself, and causes us to look to the past and future, and worry.
I have written 10 collections of poetry, about 4 of which are, perhaps, somewhat good. No one has seen them, but i need another poet to take a look. Would you be willing? Please e-mail me.